<\/p>\n
The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday dismissed a plea by Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah against the Governor’s sanction to prosecute him in the alleged Mysore Urban Development Authority (MUDA) scam case.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
The high-profile case involves allegations that MUDA illegally allotted 14 sites to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah’s wife, B M Parvati, in an upscale area of Mysuru city. A 3.2-acre tract of land lies at the centre of the MUDA scam. It has been alleged that the land was gifted to Parvathi by her brother Mallikarjunaswamy in 2010. Parvathi requested compensation and was allotted 14 plots after MUDA acquired the land. It has been alleged that these sites had a higher property value than the location of her land, which was \u201cacquired\u201d by MUDA.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
The MUDA case dates back to 23 years when land from a Kesere villager named Ninga was officially acquired. Here’s a timeline of the events leading up to the High Court rejecting Siddaramaiah’s plea challenging the Governor’s sanction for his prosecution.<\/p>\n
2001:<\/strong> A preliminary notification was issued for acquiring Ninga’s land measuring 3.16 acres, which was later denotified from the acquisition process. The same land was later utilised to form the third phase of the Devanur Layout while sites were allotted.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n November 2003:<\/strong> Land was restored in the name of its original owner.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n August 2004:<\/strong> Mallikarjunaswamy, brother-in-law of Siddaramaiah, purchased the 3.16 acres of \u2018agricultural\u2019 land.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n July 2005:<\/strong> Mallikarjunaswamy converted the agricultural land for non-agricultural use.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n October 2010:<\/strong> Mallikarjunaswamy gifted the land to his sister, Parvathi.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n June 2014:<\/strong> Parvathi sought compensation against her land being used by the MUDA.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n December 2017:<\/strong> MUDA admitted using the denotified land for the layout and decided to grant alternative sites to Siddaramaiah\u2019s wife.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n November 2020:<\/strong> MUDA agrees to award alternative sites on a 50:50 basis, which means that Parvathi will be provided half the land as developed plots.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n October 2021:<\/strong> Parvathi petitions MUDA again. She seeks alternative sites as compensation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n January 2022: <\/strong>Parvathi is allotted 14 plots in Vijayanagar.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n October 2023:<\/strong> The Karnataka government scraps the 50:50 scheme.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n July 4 2024:<\/strong> Siddaramaiah seeks \u20b9<\/span>62 crore compensation and claims his land was usurped. As a result, the Karnataka government sets up a one-man inquiry commission to probe the matter.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n July 26 2024:<\/strong> Karnataka governor Thawar Chand Gehlot issues a show-cause notice to Siddaramaiah following a petition from social activist TJ Abraham.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n August 1 2024:<\/strong> The state cabinet urges the Governor to withdraw the show-cause notice to Siddaramaiah. The CM responds to the Governor’s notice and denies all allegations.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n August 3-10, 2024: <\/strong>Opposition parties BJP and JD(S) organise a foot march to Mysuru.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n August 16 2024:<\/strong> Gehlot grants sanction for an investigation against the Chief Minister.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n August 19 2024:<\/strong> Siddaramaiah files a plea in the High Court challenging the Governor’s sanction for prosecution under Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and also under Section 218 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n September 24 2024:<\/strong> The Karnataka High Court dismisses Siddaramaiah’s petition challenging the Governor’s sanction to prosecute him in the case.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n